Loading liquidity pools
One card per position. Each holds its whole band ladder on Tempo Testnet.
Your active and closed liquidity positions will appear here.
A curve position has a range you choose and stop earning outside it, and a large trade slides along the curve and through you. A band has neither: it follows the pair's 300-second average, and it fills at a fixed distance from that average, so a trade pays more only by reaching into a wider band. What you give up for it is direction — a band re-anchors, so it keeps trading as the price moves and your deposit converts along the way.
| Trade, as % of depth | Uniswap v2 | Uniswap v3 | Curve | A band ladder |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1% | 0.50% | 0.31% | 0.04% | 0% |
| 1% | 2.25% | 0.40% | 0.06% | 0% |
| 5% | 9.34% | 0.78% | 0.14% | 0% |
| 10% | 16.88% | 1.26% | 0.25% | 0% |
| 25% | 33.47% | 2.67% | 0.69% | 0.06% |
| 50% | 50.08% | 4.94% | 6.61% | 0.24% |
| 100% | 66.70% | 9.16% | 50.16% | 0.57% |
Simulated, from the whitepaper's own experiment set (§4.5): every AMM held at a 0.30% fee, and a four-tier ladder at 0%/0.1%/0.5%/1% — the paper's tiers, not the 0.02%/0.06%/0.10% a pool here opens with. Evidence about the mechanism, not a measurement of this market. It is not a statement about what a position earns or loses. Impermanent loss is deliberately not compared: the figure the paper reports for a band is the standard formula evaluated at a clipped price ratio, which assumes the position never transacts through more than its own tolerance — and this pool's anchor follows the market, so it does.
